THE AI SURFER‹ All resources

Use AI Better Than Anyone

The Yes-Man in Your Chat Window

Stanford tested 11 AI models. Every one of them told you what you wanted to hear.

The number: AI agrees with you about 49% more than a human would. So half the time you're not getting advice — you're getting your own opinion back with better grammar.

The research: Stanford: AI advice is sycophantic — and we like it that way

Note: This isn't a Claude problem. Stanford tested 11 models — GPT, Gemini, Claude, open-source — and all of them did it. Claude's just the one most people ask for advice.

Fine for brainstorming. Expensive for decisions.

The LLM Council

The repo: github.com/karpathy/llm-council

How to install it the easy way: You don't need to read the docs. Just paste that URL into your favorite AI coding platform — Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Codex, whatever you use — and tell it "clone this repo and get it running on my machine." It'll handle the setup for you.

Andrej Karpathy — OpenAI co-founder, now at Anthropic — built it to fix exactly this. Instead of one model answering, several debate.

It runs locally through OpenRouter, so one API key gets you GPT, Gemini, Claude and Grok. Karpathy calls it "99% vibe coded" and isn't maintaining it — treat it as a pattern, not a product.

No repo? Recreate the mechanic in one Claude chat by forcing it to argue with itself.

Meet the Council

They answer independently, then review each other without knowing who wrote what. The anonymity is the whole trick — it stops the model from going soft on an idea just because it came from a "senior" voice.

Then the Chairman reads the debate and gives you one call with next steps.

Why It Works

One AI answer is built to sound helpful. The council builds in friction before you ever see an answer — someone is required to disagree, someone has no industry blind spots, and someone forces a decision at the end.

Use It For

Not lunch. Decisions with weight:


🛟 Don't Want to Build It? It's Already Done

The council, without the setup. This exact mechanic is already baked into the platform we use to get people to 90/10 — AI handles 90%, you handle the 10% that actually matters.

Why this matters: the entire point of the council is to stop one model from flattering you. When four models push back on the one that agreed with you, you've found your real answer — automatically, every time.

→ Run your council here


Never Set Up a Repo? Start Here

Easier than it sounds now that AI coding tools exist.

Too much? Skip the repo. The single-chat version works in any Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini window. Weaker, but ~80% of the benefit for zero setup.

The Takeaway

One model, one perspective, is more likely to validate you than challenge you. Run the council on a real decision you're facing this week — the contrarian alone will catch something you missed.

More builds like this at theaisurfer.com.